Imbolc

Imbolc is the second of the four Gaelic quarter-days and the least documented. The early Irish material gives a name, a position in the year, and a seasonal gloss. It gives no rite, no location, no participants and no description of anything anyone did. That is an unusual amount of nothing, and it is the most useful fact about the station.

What survives

Two items, and they are short.

The first is the position: Imbolc stands second in the fourfold list of quarter-days in the Old Irish tale literature, opening the season after winter 1. The second is an etymology. A tenth-century Irish glossary, compiled by a king-bishop with a taste for derivations, gives the alternative form oimelc and explains it from ewe-milk, the point in the year when ewes come into lactation before lambing 2.

Both of those matter and neither is a description of a festival. The glossary in question produces etymologies elsewhere that are demonstrably invented, so the ewe-milk derivation may preserve a real understanding of the name or may be a scholar’s guess at a word he had inherited 3. A lactation date is agriculturally sound for the region and the period, which is a point in its favour.

Brigit, and the convergence of dates

The saint’s feast of Brigit of Kildare falls on 1 February, the same date. A great deal of household custom is attached to it in Ireland and the Scottish Highlands: the rush cross, the doll carried from house to house, the cloth left out overnight, the bed made at the threshold. These are recorded in volume, and in the early modern and modern periods 4.

Correction

Commonly saidImbolc was the festival of the goddess Brigid, and St Brigid's customs are her rites surviving under a Christian name.

The two Brigits are a genuine puzzle and the puzzle is older than the modern retelling. A goddess named Brigit appears in the Irish glossary tradition; a saint named Brigit is the patron of Kildare and one of the three great saints of Ireland. Whether the name passed from one to the other, and in which direction, has been argued for well over a century without resolution.

What can be said precisely is what is missing. No early Irish source connects Imbolc with either Brigit. The quarter-day and the goddess are named in the same body of literature and never in the same breath. The link is a modern inference from the shared date, and shared dates in a calendar of 365 positions are not rare.

What stands in its place is the custom itself. The Brigit customs of the early modern Irish and Scottish countryside are among the best-recorded household rituals in the insular record, with named informants, dated collections, and regional variation that can be mapped 4. They are a real tradition with a real history, and the history is legible in a way the pre-Christian one is not.

What a station with no attested rite is for

Imbolc’s thinness is why it belongs in a reference work. Three of the four Gaelic quarter-days can be described from the sources with at least a sentence of content: a fire and cattle at Beltaine, an assembly at Samain, an assembly and games at Lughnasadh. Imbolc has a name and a season. The entry is therefore mostly an account of what is absent, and stating that plainly is more useful than assembling a plausible rite out of later material and the general shape of a spring festival.

Modern practice at this station is correspondingly free, and unusually inventive, because nothing constrains it. That is a reasonable thing for a living tradition to do with an empty position in its calendar; it is a different activity from reporting what a medieval source says, and the difference is the whole subject of this site.

For the sibling stations, see Beltane and Cross-Quarter Days.

Gap in the evidence

There is no evidence, at any grade, for what was done at Imbolc before the Christian period, or whether anything was done at all beyond marking the turn of a pastoral season. The name and the position are attested; practice is not. An entry that filled the gap would be writing fiction, and this one declines.

References

  1. A. G. van Hamel (ed.). Compert Con Culainn and Other Stories. Mediaeval and Modern Irish Series III. Dublin: The Stationery Office, 1933 (composed Old Irish, 8th-9th c.). https://archive.org/details/compertconculain03hame recordprimary source

    Contains the edition of Tochmarc Emire, the tale in which the four Gaelic quarter-days are named with a seasonal gloss each. Predates the ISBN system; reprinted by the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.

  2. Whitley Stokes (ed.), trans. John O'Donovan. Sanas Chormaic: Cormac's Glossary. Calcutta: Irish Archaeological and Celtic Society, 1868 (composed c. 900). https://archive.org/details/cu31924071173474 recordprimary source

    The glossary attributed to Cormac mac Cuilennáin, king-bishop of Cashel, who died in 908. Source of the Beltaine entry on the two fires and the driving of cattle, and of the derivation of oimelc from ewe-milk. Superseded as an edition but freely available and usable. Printed by O. T. Cutter.

  3. Ronald Hutton. The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain: Oxford University Press, 1996, xx + 542 pp.. ISBN 0198205708 recordpeer reviewed

    The indispensable single book on the British ritual year and its documented customs.

  4. Kim McCone. Pagan Past and Christian Present in Early Irish Literature. Maynooth Monographs 3. Maynooth: An Sagart, 1990. ISBN 9781870684101 recordpeer reviewed

    Argues that early Irish literature is the product of a monastic culture constructing a native past on biblical and patristic models, rather than a transcript of oral pre-Christian tradition.

  5. Ronald Hutton. Pagan Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013. ISBN 9780300197716 recordpeer reviewed

    A survey of the archaeological and documentary evidence for pre-Christian religion in Britain, and of what each class of evidence can and cannot bear.