Beltane

Beltaine is the third of the four Gaelic quarter-days in the Old Irish list 1, opening summer, and it is the only one of the four for which a medieval Irish source describes an actual rite. That single description carries an enormous load in the later literature, so it needs close reading and careful grading.

The one description

A tenth-century Irish glossary, compiled under the name of a king-bishop of Cashel, has an entry on Beltaine. It explains the name as a lucky fire, and says that two fires were made with great incantations, and that cattle were driven between them each year as a safeguard against disease 2.

That is a specific, practical and agriculturally intelligible claim, and it is the only ritual content the early Irish material supplies for any of the four stations. It is also a tenth-century Christian scholar’s etymological entry, written down at least four centuries after conversion, in a work whose derivations elsewhere can be shown to be invented 3. Whether the two fires preserve a memory or supply a plausible origin for a word cannot be decided from the entry itself.

What raises the confidence a little is the later record. Fire ceremonies at the opening of May, including the driving of cattle between or around fires, are described in Scotland and Ireland in the early modern period and in detail by eighteenth and nineteenth-century observers 4. The gap between the tenth century and the eighteenth is long, and the parallel does not close it; it does mean the glossary is describing something that people in the same region later did.

Correction

Commonly saidBeltane was the festival of the god Bel or Belenus, and the maypole is its central rite.

Two separate claims, and they fail in different ways.

The god first. The name’s first element has been derived several ways and the derivations do not agree with one another. None of them requires a deity, and no Irish source names a god Bel in connection with the festival. The Romano-Celtic god Belenus is attested, in inscriptions, in Gaul and northern Italy; connecting him to an Irish festival name is an inference across a language branch, several centuries and a sea, and it is not one the evidence supports 5.

The maypole second, and this is the more useful correction. The maypole is a real, splendid and thoroughly documented custom. It belongs to England and to Germanic-speaking Europe, it is recorded from the later Middle Ages, and it has its own rich history of civic sponsorship, Puritan suppression and Victorian revival 4. It is not Irish, not Gaelic and not attached to Beltaine in any source. Filing it under Beltaine takes an English tradition with several centuries of records, treated at The maypole, and hides it inside an Irish one that has a single paragraph.

Beltaine and Calan Mai

Welsh has Calan Mai, the first of May, which pairs in position with Beltaine as Calan Gaeaf pairs with Samain. The positional parallel across the two Celtic language branches is worth something, and it is the strongest reason to think the pairing of a summer-opening and a winter-opening station is older than the Irish texts that record it.

It counts for exactly that much. The Welsh material has no Imbolc and no Lughnasadh, so the fourfold scheme itself is Gaelic rather than Celtic, and the Gaulish calendar evidence does not show the four either. Two matching stations are a parallel; four are a system, and only Ireland has the system. See The Coligny Calendar.

The station in the modern year

Beltane is one of the four cross-quarter stations of the modern eightfold year, and one of the four Gardner’s early practice already observed before the solstices and equinoxes were added to it 4. Its modern observance draws on the Scottish and Irish fire custom, which is a defensible thing to draw on: that custom is recorded, dated and local, and it is the part of the Beltaine complex with the most evidence behind it.

For the three defensible datings of this station in a given year, see Cross-Quarter Days. For the sibling stations, see Samhain and Imbolc.

Gap in the evidence

The relationship between the tenth-century fire description and the early modern fire customs is not established. They may be one continuous practice, they may be two independent responses to the same agricultural problem, or the later one may have been shaped by literate people who had read the earlier notice. Nothing in the record between them settles it, and this entry does not pretend to.

References

  1. Whitley Stokes (ed.), trans. John O'Donovan. Sanas Chormaic: Cormac's Glossary. Calcutta: Irish Archaeological and Celtic Society, 1868 (composed c. 900). https://archive.org/details/cu31924071173474 recordprimary source

    The glossary attributed to Cormac mac Cuilennáin, king-bishop of Cashel, who died in 908. Source of the Beltaine entry on the two fires and the driving of cattle, and of the derivation of oimelc from ewe-milk. Superseded as an edition but freely available and usable. Printed by O. T. Cutter.

  2. A. G. van Hamel (ed.). Compert Con Culainn and Other Stories. Mediaeval and Modern Irish Series III. Dublin: The Stationery Office, 1933 (composed Old Irish, 8th-9th c.). https://archive.org/details/compertconculain03hame recordprimary source

    Contains the edition of Tochmarc Emire, the tale in which the four Gaelic quarter-days are named with a seasonal gloss each. Predates the ISBN system; reprinted by the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.

  3. Ronald Hutton. The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain: Oxford University Press, 1996, xx + 542 pp.. ISBN 0198205708 recordpeer reviewed

    The indispensable single book on the British ritual year and its documented customs.

  4. Kim McCone. Pagan Past and Christian Present in Early Irish Literature. Maynooth Monographs 3. Maynooth: An Sagart, 1990. ISBN 9781870684101 recordpeer reviewed

    Argues that early Irish literature is the product of a monastic culture constructing a native past on biblical and patristic models, rather than a transcript of oral pre-Christian tradition.

  5. Ronald Hutton. Pagan Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013. ISBN 9780300197716 recordpeer reviewed

    A survey of the archaeological and documentary evidence for pre-Christian religion in Britain, and of what each class of evidence can and cannot bear.